Some of you might remember Labor's document "Barry O'Farrell's 100 Broken Promises" that I wrote about here.
It was a stupid document - when there are perfectly legitimate reasons to attack O'Farrell's government, why publish a document that clearly overreaches? All that does is cement a belief that Labor don't really have any legitimate basis for feeling aggrieved.
Clearly the lesson was never learnt:
|Document can be found here|
A few examples:
If you're interested, you can go through the document yourself and let me know what you find.
It just baffles me why Labor would blunt a legitimate attack by what amounts to little more than padding. When I asked O'Farrell what he thought about the original "100 Promises" document, he had this to say (read from the bottom):